Moving Parts

 

We shape our buildings and afterwards our buildings shape us…”

                                                – Winston Churchill (May 10, 1941)

 


The magnificent buildings pictured above, “the city of arts and sciences,” – opera house, performing arts centre, science museum, planetarium, oceanographic park, suspension bridge and sculpture garden – were built for the City of Valencia by home-grown talent, architect Santiago Calatrava.

We had a tour of the science museum today.   I was sorry the opera house was dark tonite.

In 1981, Calatrava was awarded a doctorate in the department of architecture
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zurich, Switzerland, after completing his thesis on “The Pliability of three-dimensional structures.”  Calatrava explained that he was particularly influenced by the work of the early 20th century Swiss engineer Robert Maillart, which taught him that, “with an adequate combination of force and mass, you can create emotion.”

He says that “movement gives an added dimension to form. It makes form a living thing. Instead of thinking of a building as something mineral, like a rock, we can start to compare a building to the sea, which has waves that move, or to a flower whose petals open in the morning. This is a new, more poetic understanding of architecture.”

New, yes, but perhaps with a nod to Antoni Gaudi, whose nearby Barcelona architecture relies so heavily on nature as its inspiration.  On the side of a cathedral, a slug with its slime trail, by Gaudi,

27B098C5-8B3F-4C54-B9CB-2D627BF59C81

or a locust, as in this Calatrava building, the Palais des expositions et des congrès de Oviedo, I had seen previously in Oviedo, Spain.

 

Calatrava is not without his critics, or detractors, or lawsuits.  His epic project delays and cost overruns are notorious, matched only by his awards and honours (Wiki lists 22 honourary degrees from around the world).  Reaction to the Oculus transportation hub in lower Manhattan exemplifies the dichotomy.

Jimmy Stamp of The Guardian wrote: “I despised the new World Trade Center transportation hub before I even saw it. It’s $2bn over budget, had construction problems and design compromises, it’s seven years late and still incomplete…but when I was standing on the marble floors in its enormous, gleaming central concourse two stories below street level, staring up at a clear blue sky between bone-white ribs vaulting 160ft over my head, I, like Jonah in the whale, repented – at least for the moment….The Oculus presents a more optimistic vision, one based less on present realities and more on future possibilities. Less Blade Runner, more Star Trek. By the time we get to that future, whichever one it may be, the delays and the cost and the controversies will be forgotten, but we will be left with a luminous great hall in the heart of downtown New York.”

If your city needs to be lifted up, and NYC at the World Trade Centre site certainly did after 911, do you choose cost-saving concrete, or soaring inspiration and vision?

7D354713-F1C3-429D-A924-5CD3BF3660E8

99E67ECA-E7FE-45E6-8C46-9B7BFD9F24DDThe Oculus transportation hub, NYC

Best,

Jan

1 thought on “Moving Parts

  1. The architecture is truly awesome.Such a contrast to the Moorish architecture which is magnificent in its own way. 😘😘Joyce

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s